09 / ops
Ops / Workflow Agent
Checklists, sync, dunning, routing in the stack.
Back offices where the first hour of the morning goes on retyping the same facts between tools.
- Sheets
- CRM
- Slack
- Checklist open
- Sync systems
- Exceptions only
- Human approves writes
Halts the run when a record fails to match on both sides, because a half-synced row costs more than a stalled one.
A worker on the internal queue nobody enjoys: the file that arrives and must be checked, matched and filed, every day, in the same way. It runs the path end to end, gates the parts a human should still decide, and logs each step.
How this one gets built
Picking the first workflow
Volume times friction, and nothing else. The workflow worth automating first is the one your team touches most often and complains about most loudly, and those are usually the same one. Complexity matters far less than frequency, because a hard job done twice a week is a worse investment than an easy job done forty times a day.
Gates, not full autonomy
Most operational workflows should not run unattended end to end, and the good ones are designed with a person at the point where the cost of being wrong stops being symmetric. Matching an invoice can be automatic; approving one over a threshold is a click somebody makes. That single boundary is what makes the system something a finance team will leave switched on.
The log is the deliverable
Every run leaves a record a colleague can follow next week without asking anybody: what arrived, what was matched against what, which rule fired, and where it stopped. That trail is not a nicety attached at the end. It is the reason the workflow survives its first surprise.
When this is the wrong answer
If the process is broken when a person runs it, automating it produces the same broken result faster and with less oversight. Fix the process, then automate it, and I will say so on the call rather than after the invoice.
FAQ
Questions about this one
Is this AI or just automation?
Whichever earns its keep. A good share of these paths are rules, a queue and an integration, which run cheaper and explain themselves to an auditor far more easily. The model earns its place where the input is genuinely unstructured, such as a document nobody templated.
What happens when it breaks?
It stops somewhere you can see, which is what the gates and the trail are for. A workflow that fails loudly on a Tuesday costs an hour. The same workflow failing quietly costs a month, because by then the bad data has spread downstream.
Can our team change it after you leave?
That is the hand-off, and it is part of the job instead of something that arrives after it. They need to know how to read the trail, how to change what it does, when it stops and asks a person, and how to switch it off. If turning it off needs me, it was never finished.
Last reviewed